WG21 PAPERS

Mailings Beta

Volunteer-driven · Not affiliated with WG21 or ISO

Filter and export papers from the C++ Committee’s monthly mailings by time frame and audience using the options below, or refine your export further with the Select button. Links point directly to the official WG21 papers on open-std.org.

Audience
Wording
Evolution
Mailings
1 · Year 1 · Month

Select the arrow to the right of the year to filter for specific months.

2026 Apr · 1 of 6

Pick months in 2026

Add Year +

Select Years To Display

Current Years Selected

2026
Filters Author: Barry Revzin EWG Clear all
2 out of 2 papers selected for export
SelectPaper Title Authors Audience Doc Date
P3951R1 String Interpolation Objects B. Revzin
Intent Proposal
Mailing Date 2026-04 Post-Croydon
Author(s) Barry Revzin
Target Audience EWG
Revisions R0
Tracking issue View on GitHub
Abstract The `std::format` approach to formatting offers many significant benefits over the prior `<iostream>`s approach that need not be revisited here. However, `<iostream>` does still have one significant advantage: ordering. It is easy to see at a glance with a long `std::cout` statement which pieces are to be formatted in which order. With `std::format`, as the amount of replacement fields increases,
P4101R0 Consteval-only Values for C++26 B. Revzin, P. Dimov, D. Vandevoorde, D. Katz
Intent Proposal
Mailing Date 2026-04 Post-Croydon
Target Audience EWGCWG
Revisions R1
Tracking issue View on GitHub
Abstract The Reflection design from [[P2996R13]](https://wg21.link/p2996r13) was based on a model of having consteval-only types to prevent reflections from leaking to runtime. But we’ve run into issues and limitations with that approach, so we propose that, for C++26, we change instead to a consteval-only value model. This solves the same problems, but has additional benefits.
Showing 2 of 2 papers · source: open-std.org